SAN ANTONIO, TX – In a significant development, the **Alamo Trust President Resigns** from her post on Thursday, October 30, 2025, igniting debate across the Lone Star State. Kate Rogers’ departure follows closely after Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick publicly called for her removal, citing controversial views expressed in her 2023 doctoral dissertation. The Alamo Trust has since appointed former Texas Secretary of State Hope Andrade as its new leader to navigate the historic site’s ongoing $550 million redevelopment. This dramatic leadership change, where the **Alamo Trust President Resigns**, is the latest chapter in a growing trend of ideological clashes impacting public institutions in Texas, making it a top trending news story and highlighting concerns about Alamo Trust leadership.
Pressure Mounts Following Lt. Gov.’s Accusations Leading to Alamo Trust President Resigns
Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick sent a pointed letter to the Alamo Trust’s board of directors on Wednesday, October 29, 2025, demanding Rogers’ resignation. Patrick asserted that Rogers’ academic writings were “incompatible with the telling of the history of the battle of the Alamo” and questioned her judgment. He specifically pointed to excerpts from her doctoral dissertation, suggesting she held views at odds with Republican state leaders’ desire to emphasize the 1836 battle for Texas independence. “I believe her judgment is now placed in serious question and makes clear she has a totally different view of how the history of the Alamo should be told,” Patrick stated in his letter, which he also shared on social media. The pressure from Lt. Gov. Patrick was a significant factor in the **Alamo Trust President Resigns**. This situation contributes to the ongoing Texas political firestorm.
Rogers, who had led the Alamo Trust since 2021, confirmed her resignation in a statement, expressing “mixed emotions.” “It became evident through recent events that it was time for me to move on,” she said, signaling that political pressure had made her position untenable. An automated email reply from Rogers’ account confirmed she was “no longer at Alamo Trust, Inc.”
Dissertation Sparks Alamo Historical Narratives Debate Following Alamo Trust President Resigns
The core of the controversy lies within Rogers’ 2023 doctoral dissertation, which examined the role of historic sites and museums in supporting social studies instruction in K-12 classrooms. In her research, Rogers reportedly critiqued the “conservative agenda” of the Texas Legislature, referencing bills that banned the teaching of Critical Race Theory and the discussion of slavery. She also touched upon the book “Forget the Alamo,” which posits that the preservation of slavery was a significant motivator for the Texas Revolution. Rogers expressed a personal desire for the Alamo to become “a beacon for historical reconciliation and a place that brings people together versus tearing them apart,” but acknowledged that “politically that may not be possible at this time.” The debate over Alamo historical narratives intensified after the Alamo Trust President Resigns.
Lt. Gov. Patrick, along with other Republican leaders like Texas Land Commissioner Dr. Dawn Buckingham, advocates for a narrative that strictly centers on the “13 Days of Glory” – the iconic 1836 siege and battle where nearly 200 Texians perished defending the site. This perspective, they argue, is the true historical account that must be preserved without alteration.
Preceding Incidents and Wider Political Context for Alamo Trust Leadership
Rogers’ resignation followed a period of increased scrutiny for the Alamo Trust. Earlier in October, a now-deleted social media post honoring “Indigenous Peoples Day” and “their history at the Alamo” drew sharp criticism from conservative activists and figures like Land Commissioner Buckingham, who declared “woke has no place” at the historic site. This incident appears to have amplified existing tensions regarding the interpretation of the Alamo’s history. This event is reflective of a broader pattern in Texas politics, where Republican state leaders have actively sought to influence or remove individuals from positions perceived to hold differing ideological viewpoints, particularly concerning history and education. Such actions have been seen in debates over curriculum standards and appointments across various state agencies. The resignation of the **Alamo Trust President Resigns** is a key development in understanding Alamo Trust leadership.
New Leadership and Ongoing Redevelopment After Alamo Trust President Resigns
Stepping into the leadership vacuum is Hope Andrade, a distinguished former Texas Secretary of State who also served as a Texas Workforce Commissioner and on the Texas Transportation Commission. Andrade, who has been a board member of the Alamo Trust and the Remember the Alamo Foundation since 2015, was unanimously voted in by the board of directors as the new President and CEO, effective immediately. Hope Andrade’s appointment as the new president provides a new direction following the Alamo Trust President Resigns.
Alamo Trust Board Chair Welcome Wilson Jr. expressed confidence in Andrade’s appointment, calling her “a steady hand” with “the confidence of our benefactors, donors, and local and state leadership involved in the project”. He also extended thanks to Rogers for her service. The board acknowledged Rogers’ contributions during her tenure, which included the promotion from executive director to president and CEO in August 2025.
Reactions and Future Implications of the Alamo Trust President Resigns
The swift removal of Rogers has drawn sharp criticism from some local leaders. Former San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg described Patrick’s demand as “gross political interference” and praised Rogers’ “steady leadership.” Bexar County Judge Peter Sakai also characterized the move as “gross political interference.” Conversely, Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham commended Patrick’s “swift action” and implied that the Alamo Trust President Resigns due to a necessary correction in ideological clashes Texas.
The controversy unfolds as the Alamo undergoes a massive $550 million renovation, which includes the construction of new museum and education facilities, slated for completion in 2027. The $400 million figure is also cited for the renovation. This Alamo redevelopment project aims to tell “the entire history of the Alamo area,” a principle that appears to be at the heart of the debate between Patrick’s emphasis on the battle and the desire of local officials to incorporate broader historical contexts, including Indigenous heritage and the era of Spanish missions. The Alamo redevelopment project is now under new stewardship.
As Hope Andrade takes the helm, the Alamo Trust faces the challenge of navigating these deep-seated historical and political divisions while continuing the significant redevelopment of one of Texas’ most iconic landmarks. The incident underscores the ongoing struggle over narrative control and the intersection of history, politics, and public perception at sites of national importance. The resignation of Kate Rogers, the **Alamo Trust President Resigns**, highlights the broader ideological clashes Texas.
